Mopar Style

 

 

Portal (Home) Forums Free Classified Ads Registration/Posting Problems

Notices

» Latest Album Pictures
1972 New Yorker
Posted By: dodgechargerfan
1972 New Yorker
1972 New Yorker
Posted By: dodgechargerfan
1972 New Yorker
1972 New Yorker
Posted By: dodgechargerfan
1972 New Yorker
73 rr
Posted By: rl73
73 rr
» Welcome to MoparStyle

Welcome to MoparStyle.com

"Simply the best Mopar site on the Net!"

 

 

 

Stop and add this site to your favorites before you go any further.

Forums, News, History, Technical Papers, Free Classifieds, Mopar Photo Albums and more!

» Log in
User Name Not a member yet?
Register Now!
Password
Are you having problems with this site
Jan 05, 2009 - 12:53 PM - by Old Hippie
Are you having problems with this site

Someone is telling me at the other site (which is a clone with regards to versions of software used) that they're are having issues where the screen only builds halfway, he has to hit the back key twice for it to move, and double posting of You Tube (a Premium feature) Videos.

I have 5 computers that I use myself personally, mixed with Vista and Windows XP. I have my operating systems update nightly. I have no problems with any of those computers no matter if I'm on the road using Sprint, in the house on a wireless, or at the office with a T1.

On You Tube, everyone that has so far complained about double You Tube posting has admitted to doing it wrong. The right way is to use the link in the box labeled URL -- to the right of the movie and above EMBEDDED. Copy that link and paste it in a post. Do nothing else. The wrong way is to copy from the address bar or to paste the link in the insert hypertext function (the Globe with the chain link), or otherwise surround it with URL code.

Most other common problems are solved with clearing the cookies, the history, the temp files (cache), while off the site -- and maybe even running a spybot checker or antivirus. If you get too loaded up on Spybots -- strange things happen from the lack of memory.

The next most common problem is a firewall issue -- they're real hard to troubleshoot. At work you most likely have a hardware firewall where the IP guy can follow the sites you visit -- and blacklist them if he's a prick. At home you most likely either have a Windows or Anti-Virus branded firewall. Sometimes playing with the settings puts too tight security on. Sometimes you just accidentally black list. Try to disable to test -- and if that's the problem -- look for what setting is hosing you. Try setting the firewall settings to default and clear out ips or site in the black list.

Other common problems are the browser, its version, your security level settings, disabling Java, and 3rd party addons. Try using the other of Firefox or IE7, try resetting the browser settings to default.

If you are still having problems -- you have to give us more information to be able to help. 99% of the three word descriptions have people guessing.

1. What browser are you using?
2. Copy and paste the exact URL from the browser's address box.
3. Give a detailed description
4. Have you tried the other browser?
5. Have you tried another computer at same location?
6. Have you tried another computer at a different location?
7. Who is your ISP?
8. What firewall do you use?
9. Did you try to disable it to see if that made a difference?
10. Did you delete your cookies/history/cache?
11. Have you ran a spybot program?
12. Have you tried to log out to see if the same thing happens?
13. Have you set your Browser settings to factory default?
14. Have you set your Firewall settings to factory default.
15. Can you post a print screen to show us the problem?
16. Have you tried to ping [url]www.moparstyle.com[/url] to see if your ISP is dropping packets on the route it takes to this site?
17. It might be that your computer is too old, or has too little memory to run as many tasks (do a Ctl/Alt/Del to see what task are running in your task manager) -- or for Vista.

All problems can be solved. They are more quickly solved with good information and reasonable effort by the user to try to solve. If you would like help -- cut and paste the above to a post in this thread -- and give your answers.

Anyone who thinks they can help -- feel free to jump in.

If you can see this post -- but can't answer it -- copy and paste with your answers to helpme@moparstyle.com and someone will help.

If you are having absolutely no problems that you can blame the site for (don't blame us for wireless network drops and slowness, or an ISP that is dropping packets (ping [url]www.moparstyle.com[/url]) -- then post that here too (along with your browser, firewall, and ISP) to convince others that it isn't the site and that there is a fix.
4 Replies | 33 Views
Now in Stock
Jan 03, 2009 - 3:33 PM - by Old Hippie
MoparStyle Hooded Sweatshirts
in Black or Navy




Click shirt for details
4 Replies | 89 Views
23 Squidoo
Jan 02, 2009 - 11:44 AM - by Old Hippie
23 Squidoo


Twenty-three is the number of Squidoo Len names I've reserved so far. Of that, I've completed about half -- and the other half are what I thought were cool names to reserve to develop lens as I have time.

I'm sure 90% of you are asking what a Squiddo lens is. A lens is a one-page Portal of a subject -- with as much information as you want on it. You create it in minutes by filling out a short questionnaire about the name of the lens and what you want it to do -- and then add modules for debate, information, posts of your favorite bulletin board (HINT!), your gift shop, links, photos, videos, ...... and all of this is assembled into a Portal Page (or as they refer to it -- a Lens) on your subject. You are walked through the entire process -- and can change just about anything later. If you can barely register to post on this board -- you will still be able to create your own lens easily.

A couple examples of lens are:
  1. [url]http://www.squidoo.com/moparstyle[/url]
  2. [url]http://www.squidoo.com/nostalgiasuperstock[/url]
  3. [url]http://www.squidoo.com/bigredram[/url]
  4. [url]http://www.squidoo.com/magnumgt[/url]
  5. [url]http://www.squidoo.com/freemoparclassifieds[/url]
  6. [url]http://www.squidoo.com/oldhippie[/url]
As you can see from the URLs -- it is best to grab a memorable name having to do with your subject, before someone else does.

Squidoo -- and what's in it for them. Squidoo has the best of these interfaces for the non-computer guy to create his own lens quickly -- and it is the most visited of the lens groups. It is sort of an adult (age -- not theme) MySpace or Facebook for topics -- instead of people lying about themselves. What's in it for them, is that they will display a modest amount of advertising banners having to do with the subject of your lens (after they learn your lens). From these banners they share revenue with you -- but more on that later.

How can a Squidoo Lens be useful to you?
  • If you own a business, it can be your starter web site. Not the most professional way to go -- but it beats not having any web site at all.
  • It you have a business with a web site -- this is a good place to steer more traffic to that web site.
  • With the Internet -- there are a million work at home businesses that you can set up and stand back and collect a full time income from. I have a Cafe Press gift shop -- and while the MoparStyle members might spend less than $40 a month there on MoparStyle gift shop items for a total profit of about $6 a month -- I earn about $500 a month as profits on thousands of dollars of Racing Calendars and political T-shirts/mugs/mousepads/etc. I also bought into a service set up to sell domain names and web hosting at a discount price -- which I do real well with. These are among a few businesses that cost me very little (less that $200) upfront cash but took me a little time to set up. They now pay me a nice full-time wage for really doing nothing but promote them. A Squidoo lens (like Google Adsense) is just another way to get the word out on these side businesses you might have. I have reserved Squidoo lens for those side line businesses I have -- and will use it to promote them for yet more monthly profit. It is the American Way!
  • Hobby -- I love Mopars, drag racing, and political debate -- and a lens is a good way to have a site for those discussions (there is a "Debate" module) -- or steer traffic to a bigger site that deal with that (in my case) topic.
  • You could have a lens for you personal page -- or to steer to your Facebook or MySpace page. I don't really play that game myself -- but I did reserve my name [url]www.squidoo.com/daveschultz[/url] -- and those of my family members -- so that I have them if I change my mind. Once someone else takes them -- they're gone forever. Someone with your name might be a pedophile or stalking nutcase -- so I like to head that off at the pass. I'll most likely use the names to promote some other site.
  • Church. You could either have a religious Lens -- or promote your church with steering visitors to that site. It would be Kool is Magnumguy would do one for the Moparstyle Chapel.
  • Fan Club, Scout troop, softball team, your car, your board handle, your favorite porn star (for Plum) -- there are a million uses for a Squidoo lens.
MONEY! -- I mentioned before that Squidoo "Shares" the income earned from the clicking on banners with you. You can have that sent to you in the form of a monthly deposit into your paypal account -- or you can have it go to one of many worthy charities. You set that up in your profile when you do your lens.

You can have an unlimited number of lens. They actually have a group of people called the "Big Squids" who earn a healthy income just by creating 100s of lens and "Sharing" in the profit of the banner clicks. Now truth be told -- the pros don't just do a couple of lens and sit back expecting to become millionaires. If your angle is to derive a part time income for yourself or a charity -- you have to promote your Lens, and you have to have a good lens of interest to a large group of people. Get the lens mentioned in as many places as possible -- like your email signature, as the more places Google see's links to a site -- the high the ranking for the site.

Helping out friends with Lens: Visit their sites, as the more visits the higher the internal ranking. Give you buds 5-stars if they have a decent site. The more people giving a lens a 5-star rating -- the higher the internal ranking. I put the Lens for MoparStyle, Free Mopar Classifieds, and MagnumGT up to bring more people to this site -- as the more the merrier. If other members took the 30 seconds to click the link to that lens and then clicked 5-stars -- the higher the ranking would go there and the more visitors we'd ahve here. If you've got 30 seconds to help out this site -- why not spend it and help? You can also help on your lens by featuring the lens of your friends. There is a module that you can add to do that. Looking for context -- add MoparStyle (or Old Hippie's) threads to your lens with the RSS module.

If you have gotten this far -- I would guess that you have thought of at least one topic that would make a kool lens. Click Here to start (or at least reserve the name of) a lens. Your lens stays in a draft mode until you click the button to publish it -- so don't worry about finishing it in one sitting -- although it doesn't take that long to finish it in one sitting.

So start a Lens on your board handle or on your car to start. You are going to find that it is actually an entertaining use of your time.

Once published -- post the link to it in this thread, and if you would like an honest critique on how to make it better -- ask. When you see a Lens of your friends -- include a link to it (exchange with them) in yours -- as it helps the both of you. There are "Groups" to join by interest group -- and joining them brings more traffic to your lens. There's certainly one there for Mopars and Drag Racing -- because I created them.

Have a little fun on the Internet -- and earn a couple of bucks for you or your favorite charity.

If you have questions (AFTER) creating your lens -- ask it in this thread. Create the lens first -- and 99% of the questions would have been answered as you created your lens.
4 Replies | 95 Views
1978 Dodge Commercial
Dec 26, 2008 - 11:26 PM - by Old Hippie
1978 Dodge Commercial
From the Horrible Disco Era


1 Reply | 104 Views
Magazine Quality Photography of Your Mopar
Dec 24, 2008 - 1:10 PM - by Old Hippie
Magazine Quality Photography of Your Mopar



... [Read More]
5 Replies | 253 Views
New Chrysler Logo
Dec 18, 2008 - 2:41 PM - by Old Hippie
New Chrysler Logo

9 Replies | 415 Views
Chrysler, GM Reopen Merger Talks
Dec 18, 2008 - 9:38 AM - by Old Hippie
Chrysler, GM Reopen Merger Talks

The renewal of the talks could be a way to show Washington -- which is weighing a $14 billion rescue package for the auto industry -- that it wants to cooperate in restructuring the industry.

Wall Street Journal
FOXNews.com
Wednesday, December 17, 2008




General Motors Corp. and Chrysler LLC have reopened merger talks, as Chrysler owner Cerberus Capital Management LP has signaled its willingness to give away part of its ownership in the auto maker, say people familiar with the discussions.

With cash running low at both companies, Cerberus took the initiative to restart discussions that sputtered just weeks ago. At that time, both GM and Chrysler viewed a business combination as impractical and as a distraction from their mounting liquidity problems.

The renewal of the talks could be a way for Cerberus to show Washington -- which is weighing a $14 billion rescue package for the auto industry -- that it wants to cooperate in restructuring the industry, say people familiar with the buyout firm's thinking. And it could offer the firm a way to protect its stakes in two distressed auto-finance companies, GMAC LLC and Chrysler Financial, which are crucial to the survival of the Detroit auto makers.

It isn't clear what effect the renewed merger talks might have on the intricate political calculus hanging over a government rescue of the auto makers. Wednesday, Chrysler said it would suspend production at all 30 of its plants for a month starting Friday.

Earlier this month, Congress pressed Cerberus to inject fresh capital into Chrysler as part of any rescue plan. So far, the firm has rejected the idea, saying shareholders of rivals GM and Ford Motor Co. aren't being asked to contribute more capital, and that its investment charter prohibits such a move.

One way in which Cerberus might make concessions, however, could be to give away some of its principals' stakes in Chrysler as part of a broader restructuring. That could mean giving a future government auto czar discretion to distribute Cerberus' stake to the United Auto Workers union or even to GM.

Cerberus's equity in Chrysler has already been valued at zero by Daimler AG, which still owns 19.9% of the auto maker. But Cerberus hopes lawmakers would view such a move as a contribution to the restructuring of the troubled industry, says a person familiar with its thinking.

Chrysler is asking the government for a $7 billion bridge loan by Dec. 31. The company told lawmakers earlier this month that the financing required for even a short bankruptcy would be higher -- between $12 billion and $15 billion for a proceeding lasting just one year. But its argument got a harsh reception from many lawmakers, who questioned why Cerberus couldn't provide the financing.

For now, the Bush administration isn't planning to force GM or Chrysler into bankruptcy as a condition for receiving government aid, an option that had been on the table previously, say people familiar with the matter. The administration is still wrestling with how much money to give the auto makers and how long the aid should last, according to one of these people.
Layered on top of these complex discussions is the fate of GM's former finance unit, GMAC, in which Cerberus holds a majority stake. It also controls Chrysler's Chrysler Financial unit. Part of Cerberus's strategy, say people briefed on the matter, is to protect its majority investments in these two units.

A person familiar with the GM-Chrysler talks said that Cerberus is eager to make concessions in order to arrange a combination of Chrysler's finance arm with that of GM. "That is one of the core goals," this person said. In order to achieve that end, according to this person, Cerberus feels it has to be flexible on the use of its ownership stake in Chrysler.

Chrysler's financing arm warned auto dealers earlier this week it may have to temporarily stop making the loans they use to stock their lots with vehicles. Dealers, concerned Chrysler could seek bankruptcy-court protection, have been withdrawing as much as $60 million a day -- about $1.5 billion so far -- from the fund used to help them finance their inventory, according to a letter reviewed by The Wall Street Journal.

The financing units haven't played a big role in the jockeying over an auto-industry rescue. But federal officials are looking at whether any money put toward rescuing the auto companies might go for naught if the government couldn't also save the companies' financing arms, said one person briefed on the talks. "The fincos were ignored in the congressional debate, but they have requests out as well for money," and now they and the auto makers are being considered as a package, this person said.

Chrysler Financial and GMAC are constrained by the tight credit markets. Because they could be classified as banks, they are central to Detroit's argument for receiving government money from the Troubled Asset Relief Program, set up for the financial industry.

One developing problem in the auto makers' pursuit of government rescue funds is the state of Chrysler's collateral. Unlike GM, which has assets it can pledge or use as collateral for a federal loan, Cerberus is believed to have pledged all of Chrysler's assets in the summer of 2007 as security for $10 billion in bank debt.

GM, by contrast, could pledge its substantial operations in Europe, China and elsewhere, along with trademarks. An analysis by J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. this summer estimated those assets could raise $6 billion to $9 billion for the company. That could make the government feel more secure in lending money to the auto maker.

A spokesman for GM didn't return a phone call seeking comment.
Click here to read more of this story at WallStreetJournal.com.
5 Replies | 187 Views
Chrysler will idle all of its North American plants for a month
Dec 17, 2008 - 6:48 PM - by Old Hippie
Chrysler will idle all of its North American plants for a month

Quote:
Originally Posted by [url]http://www.freep.com/article/20081217/BUSINESS01/81217087[/url]
Chrysler LLC, which has said its cash is running dangerously low as it awaits word on federal aid, said this evening that it will idle production at all 29 of its North American plants starting with the end of shifts this Friday and running through at least Jan. 19 as it aims to align production with demand.

“Due to the continued lack of consumer credit for the American car buyer and the resulting dramatic impact it has had on overall industry sales in the United States, Chrysler LLC announced that it will make significant adjustments to the production schedules of its manufacturing operations,” the company said in a statement. “Impacted employees will not return to work any sooner than Monday, Jan. 19.”


Chrysler spokeswoman Shawn Morgan said the Windsor minivan plant and Detroit’s Conner Avenue sports car assembly plants will be closed for the entire month of January. And both Toledo Jeep plants will be closed until Jan. 26.


The plants are typically shut down from Christmas Eve through New Year’s Day and this year were already scheduled to be down and workers were to receive holiday pay from Dec. 22 through Jan. 2. Workers will be considered laid off for the additional weeks their plants are shut down.


“It comes as no surprise to me,” said Eddie Gordish, a skilled trades worker at Jefferson North Assembly in Detroit. “It seemed odd to me that they announced it as if the whole month off was new. All of a sudden everything seems so crazy, so dire. It’s hard to know what’s going on.”

Chrysler said the decision to add more down time was largely based upon reports from its dealers that they have many willing buyers, but that they are unable to close deals because of a lack of financing.


“People have to get credit to purchase vehicles,” Morgan said. “We have dealers telling us that they have customers who want to buy, but they can’t get financing. When they can get credit. Sales will improve. … But we shouldn’t be producing vehicles without orders.”


Chrysler dealers report a loss of about 20% to 25% of their volume because of the credit situation, the company said.


Chrysler and GM have both said they are dangerously close to running out of enough cash to pay their bills and are awaiting word of possible aid form the Bush administration. Analysts and people familiar with planning say the companies may not be able to pay their bills in the first week of January.
10 Replies | 262 Views
Union balks and $14B auto bailout dies in Senate
Dec 12, 2008 - 4:07 PM - by Old Hippie
Union balks and $14B auto bailout dies in Senate

Dec 12, 1:19 AM (ET)

By JULIE HIRSCHFELD DAVIS and KEN THOMAS


WASHINGTON (AP) - A bailout-weary Congress killed a $14 billion package to aid struggling U.S. automakers Thursday night after a partisan dispute over union wage cuts derailed a last-ditch effort to revive the emergency aid before year's end.

Republicans, breaking sharply with President George W. Bush as his term draws to a close, refused to back federal aid for Detroit's beleaguered Big Three without a guarantee that the United Auto Workers would agree by the end of next year to wage cuts to bring their pay into line with Japanese carmakers. The UAW refused to do so before its current contract with the automakers expires in 2011.

The breakdown left the fate of the auto industry - and the 3 million jobs it touches - in limbo at a time of growing economic turmoil. General Motors Corp. (GM) and Chrysler LLC have said they could be weeks from collapse. Ford Motor Co. (F) says it does not need federal help now, but its survival is far from certain.

Democratic leaders called on Bush to immediately tap the $700 billion Wall Street bailout fund for emergency aid to the auto industry, whose fate - along with that of the roughly 3 million jobs it touches - was in limbo.

Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., called the bill's collapse "a loss for the country," adding: "I dread looking at Wall Street tomorrow. It's not going to be a pleasant sight."

GM said in a statement it was "deeply disappointed" that the bipartisan agreement faltered. "We will assess all of our options to continue our restructuring and to obtain the means to weather the current economic crisis," the company said. Chrysler also said it "will continue to pursue a workable solution to help ensure the future viability of the company."

The White House said it was evaluating its options in light of the breakdown on Capitol Hill.

"It's disappointing that Congress failed to act tonight," Deputy Press Secretary Tony Fratto said in a statement. "We think the legislation we negotiated provided an opportunity to use funds already appropriated for automakers and presented the best chance to avoid a disorderly bankruptcy while ensuring taxpayer funds only go to firms whose stakeholders were prepared to make difficult decisions to become viable."

That bill - the product of a hard-fought negotiation between congressional Democrats and the Bush White House - was virtually dead on arrival in the Senate, where Republicans said it was too weak in its demands on the car companies and contained unacceptable environmental mandates for the Big Three.

Thursday's implosion followed yet another set of marathon negotiations at the Capitol - this time involving labor, the auto industry and lawmakers. The group came close to agreement, but it stalled over the UAW's refusal to agree to the wage concessions.

"We were about three words away from a deal," said Sen. Bob Corker of Tennessee, the GOP's point man in the negotiations, referring to any date in 2009 on which the UAW would accept wage cuts.

The Senate rejected the bailout 52-35 on a procedural vote - well short of the 60 required - after the talks fell apart. Just 10 Republicans joined 40 Democrats and two independents in backing it. Three Democrats sided with 31 Republicans in opposition. Reid also voted "no" for procedural reasons.

Congress is not scheduled to return for legislative work until early January.

Some Senate Democrats joined Republicans in turning against the House-passed bill - despite increasingly urgent expressions of support from the White House and President-elect Barack Obama for quick action to spare the economy the added pain of a potential automaker collapse.

"In the midst of already deep and troubling economic times, we are about to add to that by walking away," said Sen. Chris Dodd, D-Conn., the Banking Committee chairman who led negotiations on the package.

Alan Reuther, the UAW's legislative director, declined comment to reporters as he left a meeting room during the negotiations. Messages were left with Reuther and UAW spokesman Roger Kerson.

The stunning disintegration was eerily reminiscent of the defeat of the $700 billion Wall Street bailout in the House, which sent the Dow tumbling and lawmakers back to the drawing board to draft a new agreement to rescue financial institutions and halt a broader economic meltdown. That measure ultimately passed and was signed by Bush.

It wasn't immediately clear, however, how the auto aid measure might be resurrected, with Congress now set to depart for the year.

Democratic House Speaker Nancy Pelosi called Senate Republicans' refusal to support the White House-negotiated bill irresponsible and urged the Bush administration and the Federal Reserve to provide short-term relief for the automakers. "That is the only viable option available at this time," she said.

Congressional Republicans have been in open revolt against Bush over the auto bailout. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky joined other GOP lawmakers Thursday in announcing his opposition to the White House-backed bill, which passed the House on Wednesday. He and other Republicans insisted that the carmakers restructure their debt and bring wages and benefits in line with those paid by Toyota, Honda and Nissan in the United States.

Hourly wages for UAW workers at GM factories are about equal to those paid by Toyota Motor Corp. (TM) at its older U.S. factories, according to the companies. GM says the average UAW laborer makes $29.78 per hour, while Toyota says it pays about $30 per hour. But the unionized factories have far higher benefit costs.

GM says its total hourly labor costs are now $69, including wages, pensions and health care for active workers, plus the pension and health care costs of more than 432,000 retirees and spouses. Toyota says its total costs are around $48. The Japanese automaker has far fewer retirees and its pension and health care benefits are not as rich as those paid to UAW workers.

Republicans also bitterly opposed tougher environmental rules carmakers would have to meet as part of the House-passed version of the rescue package, and the Senate dropped them from its plan.

The House-passed bill would have created a Bush-appointed overseer to dole out the money. At the same time, carmakers would have been compelled to return the aid if the "car czar" decided the carmakers hadn't done enough to restructure by spring.

The House approved its plan late Wednesday on a vote of 237-170.

A pair of polls released Thursday indicated that the public is dubious about the rescue plan.

Just 39 percent said it would be right to spend billions in loans to keep GM, Ford and Chrysler in business, according to a poll by the nonpartisan Pew Research Center. Just 45 percent of Democrats and 31 percent of Republicans supported the idea.

In a separate Marist College poll, 48 percent said they oppose federal loans for the struggling automakers while 41 percent approved.

---

Associated Press writers David Espo and Alan Fram in Washington and Kimberly S. Johnson in Detroit contributed to this report.
__________________